1958 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 796 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Biarritz | 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Biarritz | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 1504 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
