1958 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2004 Volvo V50
To start off, 2004 Volvo V50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2004 Volvo V50. (133 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 845 kg more than 2004 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac Biarritz | 2004 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Biarritz | V50 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 1455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |