1958 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1983 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1983 Holden Commodore is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac DeVille (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1983 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 975 kg more than 1983 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac DeVille | 1983 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | Commodore |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1891 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |