1958 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac DeVille. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 705 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1958 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac DeVille | 1998 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | DeVille | Magna |
Year Released | 1958 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |