1958 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1999 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac DeVille (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 626. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 795 kg more than 1999 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac DeVille | 1999 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 626 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |