1958 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac DeVille. (189 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 822 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Because 1958 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | DeVille | CSX |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1752 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
