1958 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1983 Holden Camira
To start off, 1983 Holden Camira is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado (204 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1983 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Eldorado | 1983 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Eldorado | Camira |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |
