1958 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1987 Volvo 240
To start off, 1987 Volvo 240 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado (204 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1987 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1987 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 900 kg more than 1987 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Eldorado | 1987 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Eldorado | 240 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
