1958 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado (204 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 525 kg more than 2002 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac Eldorado | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | Eldorado | Omega |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2740 mm |