1958 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1974 Holden Monaro
To start off, 1974 Holden Monaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1974 Holden Monaro. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Monaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 895 kg more than 1974 Holden Monaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Sixty | 1974 Holden Monaro | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Sixty | Monaro |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2832 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2830 mm |
