1958 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1425 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1958 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Sixty | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sixty | Colt |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2310 mm |
