1958 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1990 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1990 Alfa Romeo 164. (149 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1990 Alfa Romeo 164. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1990 Alfa Romeo 164. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Sixty | 1990 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Sixty | 164 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2670 mm |
