1958 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 330 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Sixty | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sixty | SSU |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2570 mm |
