1958 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (167 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 872 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Sixty | 3 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1363 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4506 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2639 mm |
