1958 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 674 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Because 1958 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Chevrolet Impala | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | Midge |
Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3851 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |