1958 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 145 kg more than 2003 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Impala | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1495 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2500 mm |
