1958 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 605 kg more than 2004 Ford Puma.
Because 1958 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Impala | Puma |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 1678 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |
