1958 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3851 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3010 mm |