1958 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1958 Chrysler Imperial. (276 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1958 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 80 kg more than 1958 Chrysler Imperial. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 1958 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Chrysler Imperial | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Imperial | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5802 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 282 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2890 mm |
