1958 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 725 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1958 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Chrysler Imperial | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | Imperial | BLS |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5802 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 365 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2680 mm |