1958 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1958 Citroen 2CV. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1958 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1958 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Citroen 2CV. (50 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Citroen 2CV | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | 626 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 850 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 50 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2620 mm |