1958 Citroen 2CV vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1958 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1958 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1342 kg more than 1958 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (343 Nm) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Citroen 2CV | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | F-150 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 203 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 343 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 95 L |