1958 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 926 kg more than 1958 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1958 Citroen 2CV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Citroen 2CV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Citroen 2CV. (50 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | C70 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 850 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 50 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1661 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 68 L |