1958 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1958 Citroen 2CV. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1958 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1958 Citroen 2CV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Flex. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Citroen 2CV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Citroen 2CV. (50 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Citroen 2CV. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1958 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1958 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Ford Flex | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Flex |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 850 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 50 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
