1958 DKW 600 vs. 1963 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1963 Skoda 1202 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Skoda 1202 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Skoda 1202 (44 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Skoda 1202 should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 1963 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Skoda 1202 (85 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 1963 Skoda 1202 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW 600 | 1963 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | DKW | Skoda |
Model | 600 | 1202 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 671 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 12.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |