1958 DKW 600 vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 1983 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 1983 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW 600 | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | 600 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 671 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 149 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |