1958 DKW 600 vs. 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis (129 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis (302 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW 600 | 1983 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | 600 | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 671 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
