1958 DKW 600 vs. 1999 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1999 Mercury Sable is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Sable (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 1999 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600. 1999 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1958 DKW 600 has manual transmission. 1958 DKW 600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW 600 | 1999 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | 600 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 671 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
