1958 DKW 600 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Zo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Zo should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 1958 DKW 600 has manual transmission. 1958 DKW 600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW 600 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | 600 | Zo |
Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 671 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |