1958 DKW 600 vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (150 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW 600 | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 626 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 671 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |