1958 DKW 600 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL (217 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL (316 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW 600 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 600 | SL |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 671 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 316 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |