1958 DKW 600 vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 2006 Suzuki Reno is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 DKW 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW 600 | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | DKW | Suzuki |
| Model | 600 | Reno |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 671 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
