1958 DKW 600 vs. 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover
To start off, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 2,013 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover (370 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 340 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 DKW 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover (508 Nm) has 451 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW 600 | 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover | |
Make | DKW | Land Rover |
Model | 600 | ALL-NEW Range Rover |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 671 cc | 2013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 508 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 109 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |