1958 DKW Munga vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (102 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 DKW Munga weights approximately 12 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW Munga | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |
