1958 DKW Munga vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW Munga | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 7275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3510 mm |
