1958 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (188 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 724 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW Munga | 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Munga | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 3956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3050 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2770 mm |