1958 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 722 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW Munga | 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1832 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
