1958 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Ford Puma
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 DKW Munga weights approximately 72 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW Munga | 2003 Ford Puma | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Puma |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1038 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2450 mm |
