1958 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 620 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW Munga | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | DKW | Cadillac |
| Model | Munga | CTS |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |
