1958 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,699 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 921 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 DKW Munga | 2006 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 3699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2031 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
