1958 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (391 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 348 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 555 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW Munga | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | Munga | XJ |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3040 mm |