1958 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 884 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 DKW Munga | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Munga | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1994 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2946 mm |