1958 Ferrari Dino vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ferrari Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ferrari Dino would be higher. At 1,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Ferrari Dino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Ferrari Dino (225 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1996 Lotus Elan. (163 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Ferrari Dino should accelerate faster than 1996 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 216 kg more than 1958 Ferrari Dino.
Because 1958 Ferrari Dino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ferrari Dino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ferrari Dino | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ferrari | Lotus |
Model | Dino | Elan |
Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 804 kg | 1020 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2260 mm |