1958 Ferrari Dino vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ferrari Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ferrari Dino would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1958 Ferrari Dino. (225 HP @ 9000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1958 Ferrari Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 714 kg more than 1958 Ferrari Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ferrari Dino | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ferrari | Ford |
Model | Dino | Mustang |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 804 kg | 1518 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 59 L |