1958 Ferrari Dino vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ferrari Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ferrari Dino would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1958 Ferrari Dino. (225 HP @ 9000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1958 Ferrari Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1044 kg more than 1958 Ferrari Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ferrari Dino | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ferrari | Jaguar |
Model | Dino | XF |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 410 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 804 kg | 1848 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 69 L |