1958 Fiat 1400 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1958 Fiat 1400. (53 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1958 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 145 kg more than 1958 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Fiat 1400 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1400 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1958 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 3930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |