1958 Fiat 1900 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1958 Fiat 1900. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1958 Fiat 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 282 kg more than 1958 Fiat 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Fiat 1900 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | 1900 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2850 mm |
