1958 Fiat 500 vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1958 Fiat 500. (14 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1958 Fiat 500.
Because 1958 Fiat 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Fiat 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Fiat 500 | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | 500 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 479 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 14 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2360 mm |