1958 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1958 Fiat Campagnola. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1958 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 120 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Fiat Campagnola | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | Campagnola | 2000 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |