1958 Ford 12 M vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1958 Ford 12 M is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Studebaker Commander (140 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Ford 12 M | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | 12 M | Commander |
Year Released | 1958 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1440 mm |